Virtue Ethicists View on cultural conflict
The value ethics is an approach to ethics that indicates an individual’s character and role as the essential element of ethical thinking rather than the rules of the acts themselves or perhaps the consequences. Therefore, according to Aristotle virtues are moral divination that involves the actions of prudence and justice. Cultural conflict according to the society’s point of view is varied depending on the various cultural groups’ perceptions. It is view as a factor of disagreement that exists between two or diverse cultures. Some of the groups might view the acts as moral in the case that it fights for their rights based on what they would like to achieve at the end of the fight. However, the value ethicist would have the diverse view of the problem in the society. Therefore, the paper will discuss how virtue ethicist would view cultural conflict and also the issue of child’s marriage (Rachels, James, and Stuart).
According to Aristotle, Eudemonism is the perfect classification of the virtue ethics which hold on the fact that the proper goal of human life is characterized by happiness, wellbeing or perhaps the good of life which can be achieved through a long time practice of the ordinary virtues in the daily interaction with people. Moreover, the virtue ethics clarify that ‘’do unto others what you would love them to do to you.’’ Therefore, anything that does not protect the well-being of the other people is considered to be immoral in the society (Rachels, James, and Stuart). This is because it is based on the issue of self that does not check for the interest of both the parties. Cultural conflict is a factor that infringes the rights of the other since conflict is a basis of disagreements and the two groups cannot merge to agree due to a social problem. Therefore, it’s considered an immoral technique that creates unhappiness, lousy life and also the absence of civilization.
Child’s marriage is perceived as a point where an older adult especially a man wants to marry a young girl with an age difference estimated to be between 10 years and above. This is one of the cultural conflicts that take place between different communities based on the diverse values and ethical concern. This idea is immoral in another community while it’s accepted in another and this brings fights brought about by the difference (Rachels, James, and Stuart). On the direct view of the concept, both the parties have the distinct feeling about the issues, and in most cases, it’s the young who are being molested. Therefore, based on the virtue of ethics the problem leads to sadness and disinterest to one of the parties involved and hence it’s considered as immoral. These are based on the analysis that any situation that leads to happiness, pleasure and perhaps good life is a good thing and hence regarded as moral. The ethical issues are concerned with the welfare of the other people.
Direct intervention is the aspect of confronting matters directly with facts and points without wavering. It is one of the factors that have led to social problems among the people since approaching the problem in such manners leads to misunderstanding. The virtue ethicist considers taking matters indirectly to analysis and approach that end up bringing fairness and peace within the individuals or a group of people in the society. Aristotle describes direct intervention as immoral and leads to lack of peace and joy. He states that an evidence of wisdom is to approach factors indirectly (Aoyagi, Mark, and Steven).
Aoyagi, Mark W., and Steven T. Portenga. “The role of positive ethics and virtues in the context of sport and performance psychology service delivery.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 41.3 (2010): 253.
Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. The elements of moral philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.